GLP-1 Drugs and Sudden Vision Loss (NAION): What the Studies Show
Some studies link semaglutide and other GLP-1 drugs to NAION, a rare cause of sudden vision loss; others don't. Absolute risk, trials and regulators explained.

Key takeaways
- Large studies of people with type 2 diabetes found NAION, a rare cause of sudden vision loss, was up to almost three times as common with GLP-1 drugs; others found no clear link.
- The absolute risk is low, and pooled placebo-controlled trials have not confirmed an increase; Europe lists NAION as a very rare side effect of semaglutide, US labels do not.
- Sudden vision loss needs urgent care; talk to your prescriber before stopping a GLP-1 drug.
In this article
Several large studies have linked semaglutide and other GLP-1 drugs to a rare cause of sudden vision loss called NAION. Others found no clear link, and pooled data from placebo-controlled trials did not show one. Where an increase was seen, the extra risk was small in absolute terms: from about 1 to 16 additional cases per 10,000 people, depending on the study and how long people were followed. Europe's medicines regulator lists NAION as a very rare side effect of semaglutide; the US labels we checked on 22 October 2026 do not mention it.
This article explains what NAION is, what each type of study found, why the results differ, and what regulators and eye specialists have concluded. It covers evidence published up to 22 October 2026 and gives no treatment or dosing advice. For the wider safety picture of these medicines, see GLP-1 drugs beyond weight loss.
The short version
- The first signal came from one eye hospital. A 2024 study of patients seen by neuro-ophthalmologists in Boston found NAION was several times more common in people prescribed semaglutide. The numbers were small and the patients were already being seen for eye problems.1
- Bigger studies mostly found a smaller increase, from about 1.3 to 2.8 times the comparison group, in people with type 2 diabetes. Some found no increase at all.2345678
- The absolute risk stays low. In a 2026 US study, 8.5 in 10,000 GLP-1 users had an ischaemic optic neuropathy within 18 months, against 5.5 in 10,000 people starting a different diabetes drug.8
- Randomised trials have not settled it. Pooled placebo-controlled trials of semaglutide and liraglutide found three confirmed cases among nearly 65,000 people on the drugs and five cases among about 32,000 on placebo.9
- Regulators disagree on labelling. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) added NAION as a "very rare" side effect of semaglutide in 2025. The US prescribing information for Wegovy, Ozempic and Zepbound we checked does not list it.1415
- What to do: sudden loss of vision in one eye needs urgent medical care. If you take a GLP-1 drug and are worried, talk to your prescriber rather than stopping on your own.1214
What NAION is
NAION stands for non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. In plain words, the front of the optic nerve, which carries signals from the eye to the brain, is damaged because its blood supply drops. "Non-arteritic" separates it from a type caused by inflamed arteries. It is a rare but serious cause of sudden, often permanent, loss of vision.1011 NAION makes up about three-quarters of ischaemic optic neuropathy in adults.8
Its main risk factors overlap with the people most likely to be prescribed GLP-1 drugs: older age, diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and smoking. Every confirmed case in the pooled trial analysis had at least one of these.911 That overlap is the central difficulty in this research: when NAION is more common in GLP-1 users, it is hard to tell how much is the drug and how much is the illness it was prescribed for.
What the studies found
All but one of these are observational studies, so they show associations, not cause and effect. A hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio above 1 means NAION was more common in the GLP-1 group; if its 95% confidence interval includes 1, the difference could be chance. Our guide to correlation versus causation explains why this matters.
| Study | Design and population | Selected result | Important limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hathaway et al., JAMA Ophthalmology, 2024 | One US academic centre; 1,689 patients seen by neuro-ophthalmologists | Type 2 diabetes: HR 4.28. Overweight or obesity: HR 7.64 | Small numbers (17 and 20 cases on semaglutide); patients already referred for eye problems1 |
| Simonsen et al., Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2025 | National registries, Denmark and Norway; 61,377 semaglutide users with type 2 diabetes vs SGLT2 inhibitor users | HR 2.81; about 1.4 extra cases per 10,000 person-years | 32 NAION events in total2 |
| Chou et al., Ophthalmology, 2025 | Health records from 21 countries; about 297,000 people with diabetes, obesity or both | No statistically significant association in any group | Records data; NAION identified by diagnosis codes3 |
| Heberer et al., JAMA Ophthalmology, 2026 | US veterans with type 2 diabetes; 11,478 starting semaglutide vs 90,883 starting an SGLT2 inhibitor | HR 2.33; 0.29% vs 0.13% developed NAION | Mostly men; diagnosis codes5 |
| Choi et al., JAMA Network Open, 2026 | US veterans with type 2 diabetes; 139,546 starting a GLP-1 drug vs 448,622 starting an SGLT2 inhibitor | 39 vs 29 cases per 10,000 people over 3 years; ratio 1.35 | Older, mostly male group; residual confounding possible6 |
| Ueda et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, 2026 | Nationwide registers, Sweden; 107,518 GLP-1 users vs 185,898 SGLT2 inhibitor users | 0.12% vs 0.07% at 5 years; ratio 1.69, confidence interval included 1 | Difference largely disappeared when analysis was limited to people already on metformin7 |
| Reynolds et al., Annals of Internal Medicine, 2026 | US insurance claims; adults 18–65 with type 2 diabetes | 8.5 vs 5.5 per 10,000 over 18 months vs SGLT2 inhibitors | No specific NAION code; body weight and diabetes duration not available8 |
| Vilsbøll et al., British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2026 | Pooled randomised placebo-controlled trials of semaglutide and liraglutide; 96,829 participants | About 3 vs 6 confirmed cases per 100,000 participant-years (drug vs placebo) | Very few cases; analysis by the drugs' manufacturer and its employees9 |
Tirzepatide has much less data. A 2025 US study that grouped semaglutide and tirzepatide users with type 2 diabetes found NAION in 0.04% of them over two years, against 0.02% in a matched comparison group (HR 1.76).4
Why the results differ
Who is being compared. Studies that compared GLP-1 users with people starting another modern diabetes drug, usually an SGLT2 inhibitor, tried to match people with similar illness. Even so, GLP-1 drugs are often started later in diabetes, when people have more complications. The Swedish study found that the extra risk shrank sharply when it compared only people already taking metformin, a step meant to match disease severity more closely. The authors suggested the remaining difference "may reflect residual confounding".7
How NAION is counted. Most studies rely on diagnosis codes in medical records, which can miss cases or include the wrong ones. One study checked every coded case against clinicians' notes and found about 85% were correct; its result held up under stricter definitions, and GLP-1 use was not linked to other eye conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, which suggests the finding is specific to NAION.6
Trials versus everyday practice. Randomised trials remove most of the confounding problem but are too small for a condition this rare: the pooled trial analysis had eight confirmed cases in total.9 The EMA, which reviewed trial data as well, read them as pointing to a slightly higher risk.14 A 2026 meta-analysis that separated the evidence by study type found an increased risk only in observational studies of people with diabetes, not in trials or in people taking semaglutide for weight loss.10 Another 2026 meta-analysis rated the overall evidence as low or very low certainty.11 Our guide to evaluating a meta-analysis explains these ratings.
Relative risk versus absolute risk
A "two-fold" risk sounds alarming, but it applies to a rare event. In the Danish and Norwegian data, NAION affected about 2 to 3 per 10,000 semaglutide users each year, compared with about 1 per 10,000 on SGLT2 inhibitors.2 The US claims study estimated that about 3,333 people would need to take a GLP-1 drug instead of an SGLT2 inhibitor for 18 months for one extra case of ischaemic optic neuropathy to occur, if the link were causal.8
These figures come mainly from people with type 2 diabetes. Less is known about people without diabetes, and NAION, when it happens, can mean permanent loss of sight in an eye.10
What regulators and specialists say
- Europe. In June 2025 the EMA's safety committee concluded that NAION is a very rare side effect of semaglutide, affecting up to 1 in 10,000 people, about one extra case per 10,000 person-years. It said clinical trial data also pointed to a slightly higher risk with semaglutide than placebo, asked for the product information of Ozempic, Rybelsus and Wegovy to be updated, and said treatment should be stopped if NAION is confirmed.14
- United States. The current prescribing information for Wegovy (revised June 2026), Ozempic (August 2026) and Zepbound (September 2026) does not mention NAION or ischaemic optic neuropathy.15
- Eye specialists. A 2026 consensus statement from the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society and the American Academy of Ophthalmology said many studies report "a small possible increased risk", some report none, "the overall magnitude of the risk of NAION remains low", and the decision to start, continue or stop a GLP-1 drug should be shared between patient and care team.12 A September 2026 editorial in the same journal described NAION with these drugs as "an important rare issue, lacking adequate data".13
What is still unknown
- Whether the link is causal. No study so far separates the drug from the diseases it treats with confidence.781112
- Who might be most at risk. In the US claims study, the extra risk was concentrated in men, people over 50 and those with heart disease or existing eye conditions.8 These are hypotheses, not a screening rule.
- Risk outside type 2 diabetes, and for tirzepatide and newer drugs, which have far less data.410
What this means for you
- Treat sudden vision loss as an emergency. Sudden loss of vision or rapidly worsening eyesight in one eye needs same-day medical care, whatever medicines you take. The EMA asks people on semaglutide to contact their doctor without delay if this happens.14
- Talk to your prescriber, don't stop on your own. The specialists' advice is a shared decision that weighs your own eye and heart risks against the benefits of treatment.12 Stopping a GLP-1 drug has its own effects; see stopping semaglutide or tirzepatide.
- Mention your medicines at eye appointments, including any GLP-1 drug, so an eye specialist can take it into account.
- Report suspected side effects through FDA MedWatch or your country's reporting system. Our article on peptide clinical safety explains how these reports are used.
Frequently asked questions
Does semaglutide cause blindness?
There is no proof that it does. Some studies found NAION, which can cause permanent vision loss in one eye, was more common in semaglutide users, mainly people with type 2 diabetes; others did not, and randomised trials have not confirmed it. Where a link was found, the extra risk was small.2391012
Is tirzepatide affected too?
There is much less data. One 2025 study that grouped semaglutide and tirzepatide users found a small increase in NAION, but its published summary does not give a separate result for tirzepatide.4 The US Zepbound label does not mention NAION.15
Why does Europe list NAION as a side effect when the US doesn't?
The EMA judged that the evidence was strong enough to describe NAION as a very rare side effect of semaglutide.14 The US labels we checked had not added it as of 22 October 2026.15 Different regulators can weigh the same studies differently; neither position proves that the drug causes NAION.
Should I get my eyes checked before starting a GLP-1 drug?
None of the sources reviewed here sets a screening rule. If you already have an eye condition or other NAION risk factors, raise it with your prescriber; the specialist consensus recommends deciding together.12
How we reviewed this article
Sources
InsidePeptides relies on primary sources: peer-reviewed studies, trial registries and regulators’ own documents. Read our editorial policy.
- Hathaway JT et al. 2024. Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in Patients Prescribed Semaglutide. JAMA Ophthalmol 142(8):732-739. PMID: 38958939. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.2296.
- Simonsen E et al. 2025. Use of semaglutide and risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: A Danish-Norwegian cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 27(6):3094-3103. PMID: 40098249. DOI: 10.1111/dom.16316.
- Chou CC et al. 2025. Association between Semaglutide and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Multinational Population-Based Study. Ophthalmology 132(4):381-388. PMID: 39491755. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.10.030.
- Wang L et al. 2025. Semaglutide or Tirzepatide and Optic Nerve and Visual Pathway Disorders in Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open 8(8):e2526327. PMID: 40788646. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26327.
- Heberer K et al. 2026. New-Onset Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Initiators of Semaglutide in US Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol 144(3):259-264. PMID: 41678180. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.6262.
- Choi T, Al-Aly Z, Xie Y. 2026. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists or SGLT2 Inhibitors and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy. JAMA Netw Open 9(4):e269917. PMID: 42060307. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.9917.
- Ueda P et al. 2026. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 179(9):1232-1243. PMID: 42441962. DOI: 10.7326/ANNALS-25-02096.
- Reynolds KR et al. 2026. Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Target Trial Emulation. Ann Intern Med 179(9):1244-1253. PMID: 42441967. DOI: 10.7326/ANNALS-25-00860.
- Vilsbøll T et al. 2026. Non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy incidence in placebo-controlled clinical trials of liraglutide or semaglutide. Br J Ophthalmol, published online 28 April 2026. PMID: 42049287. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2025-328729.
- Liu Z et al. 2026. Rate and Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy with Semaglutide Use for Diabetes and Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmology 133(5):589-598. PMID: 41475544. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.12.022.
- Abdelaal A et al. 2026. Semaglutide and the Risk of Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Certainty of Evidence Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmology 133(6):799-810. PMID: 41692115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.02.013.
- DeParis SW et al. 2026. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Consensus Statement by the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society and the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 133(8):1029-1035. PMID: 42132708. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.04.008.
- Kupersmith MJ. 2026. Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Therapies: An Important Rare Issue, Lacking Adequate Data. Ophthalmology 133(11):1306-1307. Editorial. PMID: 42758068. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.08.024.
- EMA. PRAC concludes eye condition NAION is a very rare side effect of semaglutide medicines Ozempic, Rybelsus and Wegovy. 6 June 2025 (revised 13 June 2025).
- DailyMed. US prescribing information for Wegovy (revised June 2026), Ozempic (published August 2026) and Zepbound (published September 2026). Searched for NAION and ischaemic optic neuropathy, 22 October 2026.
History
Each entry records a dated change to this article’s content. Link and formatting changes are not listed.
Current version
Written by InsidePeptides Editorial Team
Scientific review pending
Last updated
Published




