Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide, and the CagriSema Combination

Cagrilintide and semaglutide act on different appetite hormones, amylin and GLP-1. Novo Nordisk is developing them mainly as a combination, CagriSema. Semaglutide alone is an approved medicine; cagrilintide alone and CagriSema are not. Several trials randomized people to cagrilintide alone, semaglutide alone and the combination, but most published summaries focus on the combination.

Investigational FDA Approved Direct three-arm randomized data (phase 2, type 2 diabetes)
Comparison banner for cagrilintide, an investigational amylin analogue, semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, and their CagriSema combination.
Cagrilintide acts on amylin and calcitonin receptors, semaglutide on GLP-1 receptors; CagriSema combines the two. Illustration © Inside Peptides.
Evidence-Based Short Answer

Evidence-Based Summary

Three separate questions are often blurred together. (1) Cagrilintide alone: in a 26-week phase 2 trial in adults with obesity, weight fell 6.0% to 10.8% across dose groups versus 3.0% with placebo. (2) Semaglutide alone: approved, with 14.9% average weight loss versus 2.4% for placebo over 68 weeks in STEP 1, plus cardiovascular outcome benefit. (3) The combination, CagriSema: 20.4% versus 3.0% for placebo over 68 weeks in REDEFINE 1. The cleanest direct comparison of all three comes from a small 32-week phase 2 trial in 92 people with type 2 diabetes: weight change was −15.6% with CagriSema, −8.1% with cagrilintide and −5.1% with semaglutide, while HbA1c fell 2.2, 0.9 and 1.8 percentage points. CagriSema beat both single drugs for weight; the published abstract does not report a statistical test of cagrilintide against semaglutide. Neither cagrilintide nor CagriSema is FDA-approved.

Medical disclaimer: Inside Peptides provides educational, evidence-first scientific analysis. Cagrilintide and CagriSema are investigational; online "research" cagrilintide is not the trial product. Treatment decisions belong with a qualified clinician. We do not provide treatment recommendations.
At a Glance

Quick Comparison: Cagrilintide vs Semaglutide

A high-level comparison of molecule class, molecular receptor targets, FDA regulatory approvals, and verified clinical programs.

Table 1: Verified regulatory, pharmacological, and clinical comparison between Cagrilintide and Semaglutide.
Feature Cagrilintide Semaglutide
Class Investigational long-acting amylin analogue Approved GLP-1 receptor agonist
Target receptors Amylin receptors and calcitonin receptor (nonselective, in cell studies) GLP-1 receptor
How it is given Once-weekly injection under the skin, alone or with semaglutide, in trials only Once-weekly injection or daily tablet, depending on product
U.S. regulatory status (October 2026) Not FDA-approved, alone or as CagriSema; FDA says cagrilintide cannot be used in compounding FDA-approved in several products (Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy)
Strongest human evidence Phase 2 trial alone; phase 3 trials (REDEFINE, REIMAGINE) mainly as part of CagriSema Phase 3 trials plus cardiovascular and kidney outcome trials
Main safety concerns Gastrointestinal effects, mainly nausea; injection-site reactions Gastrointestinal effects; label warnings including pancreatitis and gallbladder disease, and a boxed warning based on rodent thyroid C-cell tumors
Direct comparison Phase 2 three-arm trial in type 2 diabetes; REDEFINE 1 and REIMAGINE 2 also had single-drug arms Same trials
WADA status (2026 List) Not named; as a drug with no regulatory approval it may fall under S0 (non-approved substances) Not named on the 2026 Prohibited List
Receptor Biology

Amylin and GLP-1: Two Different Fullness Signals

Amylin is a hormone released by the pancreas with insulin; it slows stomach emptying, lowers glucagon after meals and promotes fullness. GLP-1 is a gut hormone that boosts insulin release and reduces appetite. Because the pathways differ, combining them was expected to add to each other, which is the rationale for CagriSema.

Cagrilintide Target

Cagrilintide

Primary Target: Amylin receptors and the calcitonin receptor

Affinity Profile: Nonselective amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist in cell studies; lipidated for weekly action

Engineered from amylin to avoid clumping into fibrils and to last long enough for weekly injection. In cell assays it activated both amylin and calcitonin receptors, unlike the older amylin analogue pramlintide.

Semaglutide Target

Semaglutide

Primary Targets: GLP-1 receptor

Affinity Profile: Selective GLP-1 receptor agonist

Supports glucose-dependent insulin release, lowers glucagon and reduces food intake.

Regulatory Status

FDA Status: Semaglutide Approved, Cagrilintide and CagriSema Not

United States status checked 10–11 October 2026.

Investigational

Cagrilintide Status & Formulations

Neither cagrilintide nor CagriSema is FDA-approved; no record appears in Drugs@FDA or DailyMed. FDA states cagrilintide is not a component of any FDA-approved drug, has not been found safe and effective for any condition and cannot be used in compounding.

FDA Approved

Semaglutide Status & Formulations

Ozempic injection covers type 2 diabetes and specified cardiovascular and kidney risk indications. Rybelsus and Ozempic tablets have their own diabetes and cardiovascular indications. Wegovy injection and tablets cover defined weight and cardiovascular indications; pediatric and MASH indications differ by formulation.

Critical Regulatory Distinction

An approved semaglutide product does not make CagriSema or cagrilintide approved. Mixing semaglutide with online cagrilintide is not the trial combination and has no approved use.

Clinical Evidence

Cagrilintide Alone, Semaglutide Alone and CagriSema

Figures from different trials are not directly comparable. The direct comparisons below come from trials that randomized participants to more than one of these treatments.

Cagrilintide: Alone and within CagriSema

Alone: a 26-week phase 2 trial (706 on cagrilintide, 99 on liraglutide, 101 on placebo; no diabetes) found weight loss of 6.0% to 10.8% vs 3.0% with placebo; the top dose group lost more than liraglutide (10.8% vs 9.0%). In a 32-week phase 2 trial in type 2 diabetes, cagrilintide alone lowered weight 8.1% and HbA1c 0.9 percentage points. Within CagriSema: REDEFINE 1 (3,417 adults without diabetes, 68 weeks) found −20.4% with CagriSema vs −3.0% with placebo; the trial also had cagrilintide-alone and semaglutide-alone arms, but the published abstract reports only the combination-versus-placebo result. REDEFINE 2 (1,206 adults with type 2 diabetes): −13.7% vs −3.4%.

Semaglutide: Alone and within CagriSema

Alone: STEP 1 found −14.9% vs −2.4% with placebo over 68 weeks; SELECT showed fewer major cardiovascular events than placebo (6.5% vs 8.0%). Against CagriSema: in REDEFINE 5 (331 adults in Japan and Taiwan, 68 weeks), CagriSema lowered weight 18.4% vs 11.9% with semaglutide alone. In REIMAGINE 2 (2,713 adults with type 2 diabetes), HbA1c fell 1.91 points with CagriSema vs 1.75 with semaglutide alone, a small but statistically significant difference. In the 32-week phase 2 trial, semaglutide alone lowered weight 5.1% and HbA1c 1.8 points.

Evidence Matrix

Curated Clinical Evidence Table

A curated selection of the primary studies behind each compound’s evidence profile. Results from different studies are not directly comparable.

Table 3: Key studies evaluating Cagrilintide and Semaglutide.
Study & Citation Population Comparison & Dosing Duration Main Endpoint Key Finding Methodological Limitations
Phase 2 three-arm trial (Frias et al., Lancet 2023) 92 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor CagriSema vs semaglutide alone vs cagrilintide alone, double-blind 32 weeks HbA1c change; body-weight change (secondary) Weight: −15.6% CagriSema, −5.1% semaglutide, −8.1% cagrilintide. HbA1c: −2.2, −1.8 and −0.9 points. CagriSema beat both for weight; for HbA1c it beat cagrilintide but not semaglutide (p=0.075). Small and short; no reported statistical test of cagrilintide vs semaglutide. Funded by Novo Nordisk.
Cagrilintide phase 2 (Lau et al., Lancet 2021) Adults with overweight or obesity, without diabetes; 706 on cagrilintide Cagrilintide (five dose levels) vs liraglutide vs placebo 26 weeks Percent change in body weight −6.0% to −10.8% vs −3.0% with placebo; top dose vs liraglutide 10.8% vs 9.0%. Short; not compared with semaglutide. Industry funded.
REDEFINE 1 (Garvey et al., NEJM 2025) 3,417 adults with overweight or obesity, without diabetes CagriSema vs semaglutide alone vs cagrilintide alone vs placebo (21:3:3:7) 68 weeks Percent change in body weight, CagriSema vs placebo −20.4% vs −3.0% with placebo (difference −17.3 points). Abstract does not report the single-drug arm results; primary comparison is against placebo.
REDEFINE 5 (Yamauchi et al., Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2026) 331 adults in Japan and Taiwan with overweight or obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes CagriSema vs semaglutide alone 68 weeks Percent change in body weight (trial product estimand) −18.4% vs −11.9% (difference −6.5 points). East Asian population; no cagrilintide-alone arm.
REIMAGINE 2 (Buse et al., Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2026) 2,713 adults with type 2 diabetes on metformin, with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor CagriSema vs semaglutide alone vs cagrilintide alone vs placebo 68 weeks HbA1c change, CagriSema vs semaglutide −1.91 vs −1.75 points (difference −0.16). Small added glucose benefit; abstract gives cagrilintide-alone safety but not efficacy figures.
STEP 1 (Wilding et al., NEJM 2021) 1,961 adults with overweight or obesity, without diabetes Weekly injectable semaglutide vs placebo 68 weeks Percent change in body weight −14.9% vs −2.4% with placebo. Separate trial; not directly comparable with REDEFINE 1 or the cagrilintide phase 2 trial.
Safety & Tolerability

Adverse Effects Alone and in Combination

Gastrointestinal effects dominate for both drugs and are more frequent with the combination than with placebo. Cagrilintide has no FDA label.

Boxed Warning

Semaglutide only: Boxed Warning for thyroid C-cell tumors

Semaglutide labels carry a boxed warning because thyroid C-cell tumors occurred in rodents; whether this happens in humans is unknown. Cagrilintide and CagriSema have no FDA label, so no labelled warnings exist; that is not evidence they are safer.

Table 4: Evidence-supported safety considerations and adverse-reaction frequency for Cagrilintide and Semaglutide.
Safety Consideration Cagrilintide Semaglutide
Gastrointestinal adverse events vs placebo Cagrilintide alone (phase 2): 41%–63% vs 32%, mainly nausea (20%–47% vs 18%) Semaglutide alone (STEP 1): nausea and diarrhoea most common; 4.5% stopped for gastrointestinal events vs 0.8%
In combination (CagriSema) REDEFINE 1: gastrointestinal events 79.6% vs 39.9% with placebo REDEFINE 5: gastrointestinal events 53% with CagriSema vs 51% with semaglutide alone
Any adverse event (REIMAGINE 2) Cagrilintide alone: 82.2%; CagriSema: 86.9% Semaglutide alone: 81.2%; placebo: 70.5%
Label warnings None (no FDA label) Pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, dehydration-related kidney injury, hypoglycemia with insulin or an insulin secretagogue; see product label
Pharmacological Commonalities

What Cagrilintide and Semaglutide Have in Common

Where the two compounds overlap in biology, evidence or regulatory context.

Weekly injections from the same developer

Both are long-acting peptides from Novo Nordisk, designed for weekly injection.

Appetite reduction

Both reduce food intake and slow stomach emptying, through different hormone pathways.

Gastrointestinal side effects

Nausea is the most common side effect for both.

Distinguishing Features

Key Scientific & Clinical Differences

Meaningful distinctions in mechanism, strength of evidence, safety and regulatory status.

Different hormone systems

Cagrilintide mimics amylin; semaglutide mimics GLP-1.

Glucose effect

In the phase 2 diabetes trial, semaglutide lowered HbA1c more than cagrilintide alone (1.8 vs 0.9 points), while cagrilintide lowered weight more (8.1% vs 5.1%); no direct statistical test was reported.

Approval and outcomes

Semaglutide is approved with cardiovascular outcome data; cagrilintide has neither, and its CagriSema outcomes trial (REDEFINE 3) is ongoing.

Inside Peptides Editorial Policy

Scientific Comparison vs Clinical Recommendations

Inside Peptides compares scientific evidence, receptor pharmacology, and official regulatory documents to advance public and professional understanding. We do not determine which compound is appropriate for an individual patient, rank medications with arbitrary scores, or recommend initiating or switching treatments.

Decisions about any medicine require a licensed healthcare professional who can weigh personal medical history, contraindications, interactions and monitoring needs. Unapproved peptides have no established safe use, and products sold as “research chemicals” are not the preparations studied in clinical research.

Evidence Verification

Approved Uses vs Online Claims

A critical scientific distinction between verified, FDA-approved clinical uses and unverified claims circulating on social media and vendor platforms.

Adding cagrilintide to semaglutide roughly doubles weight loss

Partly supported
Regulatory Context:

CagriSema is not FDA-approved.

Scientific Reality:

In trials that randomized both, CagriSema produced more weight loss than semaglutide alone (for example 18.4% vs 11.9% in REDEFINE 5). The size of the gain varies by trial and population, and the combination also brings more gastrointestinal effects than placebo.

Combining prescription semaglutide with online cagrilintide recreates CagriSema

Not supported
Regulatory Context:

FDA states cagrilintide cannot be used in compounding.

Scientific Reality:

Trial CagriSema is a manufactured product with controlled quality. Online cagrilintide is unapproved and unverified, and self-made combinations have not been studied.

Claim-Level Certainty

Evidence Strength Across Clinical Domains

Inside Peptides evaluates scientific certainty at the claim level. Because clinical evidence varies significantly depending on the therapeutic endpoint evaluated, each domain is assessed independently.

Weight reduction, single drug

Cagrilintide alone has phase 2 efficacy data and phase 3 arms not yet fully reported in abstracts; semaglutide alone has multiple phase 3 trials and approval.

Cagrilintide: Early Human Evidence
Semaglutide: Strong Evidence

Weight reduction, as CagriSema

Phase 3 trials show the combination beats placebo and semaglutide alone; it is not approved and long-term outcomes are pending.

Cagrilintide: Moderate Evidence
Semaglutide: Moderate Evidence

Cardiovascular outcomes

SELECT showed benefit for semaglutide; REDEFINE 3 (CagriSema) has not reported.

Cagrilintide: Insufficient Evidence
Semaglutide: Strong Evidence

Cagrilintide vs semaglutide directly

One small 32-week phase 2 trial in type 2 diabetes gives both single-drug results, without a reported head-to-head test.

Cagrilintide: Early Human Evidence
Semaglutide: Early Human Evidence
Unresolved Questions

What Research Still Doesn’t Tell Us

Identifying open scientific questions, pending active-comparator trials, and areas where long-term clinical data remain incomplete.

Single-drug arms of large trials

REDEFINE 1 and REIMAGINE 2 randomized participants to cagrilintide alone and semaglutide alone; full comparison of those arms should be read in the full papers, not inferred from abstracts.

Cardiovascular outcomes

REDEFINE 3 is testing CagriSema in people with cardiovascular disease; it is active, not recruiting.

Cagrilintide on its own

A phase 3 program for cagrilintide alone (RENEW 1) is under way, so its standalone evidence is still early.

Industry funding

All trials summarized here were funded by Novo Nordisk.

Related Compound Profiles

Individual profiles provide full molecular datasheets, CAS numbers, preclinical histories, and compound monographs.

Bibliography & Sources

Scientific & Regulatory References

Every pharmacological mechanism, clinical trial result, and regulatory approval cited on this page is traceable to official FDA prescribing documentation, ClinicalTrials.gov registries, or peer-reviewed medical publications.

  1. Phase 2 randomized controlled trial · Three-arm
    Efficacy and safety of co-administered once-weekly cagrilintide 2·4 mg with once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg in type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial
    Frias JP et al. (2023) · Lancet.
    Article title reproduced as published; it is not dosing guidance. Registry: phase 2, completed, 92 enrolled.
  2. Phase 2 randomized controlled trial
    Once-weekly cagrilintide for weight management in people with overweight and obesity: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, dose-finding phase 2 trial
    Lau DCW et al. (2021) · Lancet.
  3. Phase 3 randomized controlled trial
    Coadministered Cagrilintide and Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity
    Garvey WT et al. (2025) · N Engl J Med.
  4. Phase 3 randomized controlled trial
    Cagrilintide-Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
    Davies MJ et al. (2025) · N Engl J Med.
  5. Phase 3 randomized controlled trial · Active comparator
    Efficacy and safety of co-administered cagrilintide and semaglutide versus semaglutide alone in adults with overweight or obesity with or without type 2 diabetes in Japan and Taiwan (REDEFINE 5): a multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3a trial
    Yamauchi T et al. (2026) · Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.
  6. Phase 3 randomized controlled trial · Active comparator
    Cagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide in people with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 2): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study
    Buse JB et al. (2026) · Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol.
  7. In vitro receptor pharmacology
    AM833 Is a Novel Agonist of Calcitonin Family G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Pharmacological Comparison with Six Selective and Nonselective Agonists
    Fletcher MM et al. (2021) · J Pharmacol Exp Ther.
    AM833 is cagrilintide. Cell-based study; funded by Novo Nordisk.
  8. Medicinal chemistry
    Development of Cagrilintide, a Long-Acting Amylin Analogue
    Kruse T et al. (2021) · J Med Chem.
  9. Phase 3 randomized controlled trial
    Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity
    Wilding JPH et al. (2021) · N Engl J Med.
  10. Cardiovascular outcomes trial
    Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes
    Lincoff AM et al. (2023) · N Engl J Med.
  11. Registry record
    REDEFINE 3: A Research Study to See the Effects of CagriSema in People Living With Diseases in the Heart and Blood Vessels
    ClinicalTrials.gov (2026).
  12. Registry record
    Weight Loss in People Living With Overweight or Obesity Following Treatment With Cagrilintide (RENEW 1)
    ClinicalTrials.gov (2026).
  13. FDA safety communication
    FDA's concerns with unapproved GLP-1 drugs used for weight loss
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026).
  14. Official U.S. prescribing information
    Wegovy injection and tablets, current U.S. label
    DailyMed / National Library of Medicine (2026).
  15. Official U.S. prescribing information
    Ozempic injection, current U.S. label
    DailyMed / National Library of Medicine (2026).